Whether a Certificate-Of-Appealability should be granted for the following Claims/Issues :

1, Whether fact of an Actual Loss Amount, which sets the maximum pecuniary criminal sentence for which there is no prescribed statutory range, is a fact that must be found beyond a reasonable doubt.

2, Whether Judicial fact-finding, by a preponderance of the evidence, which carries Collateral consequences such as deportation, and increases the pecuniary criminal sentence for which there is no prescribe statutory range, impedes the Six Amendment's Jury trial guarantees, conflicts with the 6th Circuit's and relevant decision of this Supreme Court.

3, Whether my conviction should be vacated due to the fact that I was convicted with tinted evidence obtained unlawfully from my unabandon office, by the government, admittedly without a search-and-seizure-warrant, thus conflicting with the relevant decision of this Supreme Court and the IV Amendment.

4, Whether Counsels were ineffective for ignoring my explicit instructions to investigate and raise my much more substantive and meritorious issues without any legitimate strategic purpose. If so, does this establish sufficient cause and prejudice to overcome all procedure bar, for not raising said issues at trial, and on direct appeal.

5, Whether the disposition of my issues should be converted from a habeas to a Writ-Of-Carom-Nobis due to the fact that my habeas litigation outlived my sentence, and there are still ongoing pecuniary and collateral consequences such as deportation being inflicted on me, by the conviction and judgment, after sentence is complete, terminate and or expires.

Whether a Certificate-Of-Appealability should be granted