No. 19-6046

Steven Gary Sanders v. William Beck, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-09-25
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 1st-amendment 4th-amendment civil-rights due-process excessive-fines fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment law-enforcement search-and-seizure vehicle-seizure
Latest Conference: 2019-11-22
Question Presented (from Petition)

1) Ds tt not a vislehen of the RehKenev's 4 Ste BF and 1h Amendment rights then!
a SEI Unknown officec/oPicers search ancl setee
lis vehicle by entering oad driving ot From
porting area absent Filing any peperisavk ov fal~
Vousing any steacerdied procedure, when it Was
nok facideat te arcesh noc did sacch ofRcers have
any vaformalon tHe vehicle hed been usecl wn
acy crim laa | ochvit y!

2.) Ds it not a wolekon of the Pebhonesk
4 Ss aac IS Qirend ment rights ushens law enforcermnent oBicerc cons pice 4. Freudulert y concec|
the ideaky and ttle gel echKens of officers thet
Megelly Seerched and setzed the Peh'Hanes's vehicle?

3.) Hs tk not ce Wolehon of the PehhHones's
gts Prrmeadment veqh* to be free Gom excessive
Fines/punichment and his 1H Ayendment right to
duc precess when ¢ law enforcement Megelly
seizes Wiis vehicle due ts allecedt betng Snvolved tA erimina\ wetuity, yh l econ
cher ges sere BAited by sarvd ofRcers?

: +.) Ts it nct a wolehon of the Rh Noner!s
HSE and 144 Amendment eights whent law
enfevcemeat civeumvents all kaswa pocemcters
of skk and federc\ lees by conducting on "Favertory" search of ls vehicle oFterLeaphesis
added] being denied a search Werrect by a
Stele Attorney duc te the Keb Here sas no
nevus betuecan the alleged chime and vehicle® :

&) Bes th moh 2 WoleWon of He RKRonek
He SEB and is Amendment eights wheat law
enforcement seires he vehicle ask just once but
tesice, price Lemphesis odded | Te receiving uAco>
vvaorated hearsay thet the vehicle had poss
bly been Used tA carina achviky MA anot
they vavisdichtsn 2

G) Ts He decuston by the US, Dishict Court
for the Northern District of Flonde and dhe Cleventh Circuit Court of Appec(s be Faregs tHe
telling of He stehk of imadbeh one uthen oh
wes evident thet the Defendant conspired bs
Freudulently esnceel their Nlegel eehons a on
attempt te prevent ead prolong pr Pel honer
from aiscovesing gard achksas MA ia Heonely meaner an uncansht-bonel denrel of Due Process
under the IM Amendment?

1.) Ts te decision by He U.S, Dishict Court
For the Northern Orshict sf Flavide and the Cle verth Circult Couct of Appects te Fore gs en evidenRery hearing Ctel

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Issues being raised

Docket Entries

2019-11-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2019.
2019-09-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 25, 2019)

Attorneys

Steven Gary Sanders
Steven Gary Sanders — Petitioner