1. Were The Rights Of A Defendant Under The Due Process Clause Of The Fourteenth Amendment Of The United States Constitution Properly Observed When The State Of Georgia Utilized "The Vein Biopsy Nexus A Teroid AG& ons Directly Heaped Trona Me Te Reloaded Te The Netti ?

2. Were The Rights Of A Sendak Properly Utilized Under The Fran Asad Faoekcentn Anendmishs thea "Whe, "Veto\ Cave' Cecodes Au Ancemen's Tn The Tis dickmasy Removing, ane Elemen®s Of 7 Taken Te Murder, Fee Whe Suays Cansidtaaion ibich Lowes Preddicotsed pen Ans Rogrowoded AMasawlk Cheaar, * GAN The TZesken® "We Comat Morden, 7

3. Woes Are Broke OF Geena Fellows The United BrNokts Counsdt\eoeion "Kin Gort easing, KA WeSeudosd's SWAN Amendment Rid To E8Sectiwe Asissrkoance Of Coumsc\ Dering, XY SNeags oO A Getminod Cose?

Whether the rights of a defendant under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment were properly utilized by the State of Georgia