No. 19-6040
Ruthen James Weems III v. Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Hillcrest
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process expert-report medical-liability medical-privacy privacy standing takings
Latest Conference:
2019-11-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing Weems' claims against Baylor, Scott and White-Interest for failure to meet the expert report requirement under Section 74.351 of the Texas Medical Liability Act, in violation of Weems' constitutional right to procedural due process under the Fourteenth Amendment
Docket Entries
2019-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-10-04
Waiver of right of respondent Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Hillcrest to respond filed.
2019-09-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 24, 2019)
Attorneys
Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Hillcrest
Ben Selman — Naman, Howell, Smith & Lee, PLLC, Respondent
Ruthen James Weems III
Ruthen James Weems III — Petitioner