No. 19-6036
Arturo Eduardo Dominguez-Calderon v. United States
Tags: appellate-review courts-of-appeals criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process holguin-hernandez-v-united-states judicial-discretion remand sentencing-factors sentencing-review substantive-reasonableness
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference:
2019-11-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether substantive reasonableness review requires or permits the courts of appeals to "reweigh the sentencing factors"?
SUBSIDIARY QUESTION: Whether the Court should hold the case pending the resolution of Holguin-Hernandez u. United States, No. 18-7739, 2019 WL 429919, _S.Ct.__, _U.S._ (June 3, 2019)(granting certiorari), and potentially grant certiorari, vacate the judgment below, and remand in light of that case?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether substantive reasonableness review requires or permits the courts of appeals to 'reweigh the sentencing factors'
Docket Entries
2019-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
2019-10-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-09-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 24, 2019)
Attorneys
Arturo Eduardo Dominguez-Calderon
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent