1. With a Fourth Amendment knock-and-announce violation in Petitioner's parole search, and where no case in nearly 50 years ever held that knock-and-announce did not apply to parole and probation searches, is that "clearly established law" or "robust consensus" of case law for qualified immunity in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case? (Or, does Samson v. California undo all that case law under the Fourth Amendment?)

2. Without Congressional approval in 42 U.S.C. § 1983, should qualified immunity be reconsidered or eliminated in Fourth Amendment cases because qualified immunity leaves these constitutional violations wholly unremedied and undermines police deference to and respect for the Fourth Amendment?

Whether qualified immunity applies to § 1983 actions for failure to knock-and-announce in parole searches