1. Did the Northern District. Amarillo Division, abuse
it's descretion in not forwardinn the total "discovery'
of "unanswered admission, affidavit" to the Fifth Cir
cuit Court of Anneals that sunoorted the claim brounht
aqainst the Gov. attornev orosecutor Jim Yont7. , for
consoirina a intentional scheme to offer fraudulent
material evidence into the courts mechcanism in order
to make a nexus to the contraband listed in the indict
ment? Too, the "exnansion of record" that hold the kev
to the truth of the matter?

2. Did the Fifth Circuit Court of Anneals abuse it's
descretion in not send Detitioners Rule 60 motion back
to the Northern District Court for abuse of descretion
and to be rule on in it's orooer statutory statue in
the headinn of the motion?

?. When a "aareement" between the Court and a defend
ant. have not been honored to represent "ownership" of
confiscated currency in oro-se at trial on the date
set- and later hold the trial in rem when the oro-se
netitioner was in the same olace civil action was ser
ved bv virture of "blue warrant" but came for netition
er to oro-se reoresent in trial is that misconduct
of the court-?

4. Beina that oro-se oetitioner can't file ineffect
ive counsel on seld- did all of the nrosecutorial neaative avertment listed in his Rule 60 cause: him to
be ineffective as the weaker?

Did the Northern District Court abuse its discretion in not forwarding the full discovery to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals?