No. 19-6002

Nicole Rena McCrea v. Mark S. Devan, et al.

Lower Court: Maryland
Docketed: 2019-09-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure due-process federal-jurisdiction judicial-conflict legal-sufficiency maryland-law maryland-rule standing statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-11-22
Question Presented (from Petition)

Is the Maryland Court of Special Appeals ' March 13, 2019 unpublished Opinion
and Memorandum affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court of Charles County
in material conflict with the Supreme Court of the United States ' recent decision
outlining what is facially sufficient (Dahda v. US. 138 S. Ct. 1491 at 1499
Supreme Court 2018) with regards to the statutory provisions of Maryland
Rule( "MD Rule ") ft 14-211?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is the Maryland Court of Special Appeals' March 13, 2019 unpublished Opinion and Memorandum affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court of Charles County in material conflict with the Supreme Court of the United States' recent decision outlining what is facially sufficient (Dahda y. US. 138 S. Ct. 1491 at 1499 — Supreme Court 2018) with regards to the statutory provisions of Maryland Rule(MD Rule) § 14-211?"

Docket Entries

2019-11-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2019.
2019-10-21
Brief of respondents Mark Devan, et al. in opposition filed.
Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
2019-09-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 21, 2019)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Mark Devan, et al.
Virginia Wood Barnhart — Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP, Respondent
Nicole McCrea
Nicole Rena McCrea — Petitioner