True the felony had to be independest of the illing,was
Prejudicial and sequses Reversal of The Special.
C'rcunstance Finding

Code Section 1los stad a prejuticial Impuct an the Jirry'5
Consideraticn of Apppellant 's acilt of Murder, Robbery ard

A. The Priorcrime was rota seaual offense wd-was
Inad missible Rurscant to Evidence code sectien llo8?

Under Eviderce code secticn 352?

C. The Admission of the Pricr Acts Evidence Requdres
Reversal of Appellant's convictions 3

Rulisogs agaen Defendant in thars case?

wks grven at trial oratthe erdme:saeme?

Was the Deferdant 4n the fight stated of nind wiler he gen the stutenent/
Confesercn to thc Aoirce and hts asrlfrinend?

Stute faws. Whes Makrtrg decesion on the Defeslant case?

Is the Deferdant is astualty Innocence of all crimnal Choges
agenst tin?

Whether the lower court erred in its rulings on the admissibility of evidence and jury instructions, resulting in prejudicial impact on the defendant's right to a fair trial and conviction for robbery-murder