No. 19-599
Samuel C. Mohorne v. Beal Bank, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-challenge due-process equal-protection foreclosure free-speech homestead-property property-rights standing state-court statutory-interpretation writ
Latest Conference:
2020-03-06
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
What is the appropriate procedure when the Court uses a service of foreclosure order for one property and takes two properties in one foreclosure?
2Whether the State Court alias writ on the Debtor's Homestead Property were unconstitutional without a foreclosure by the State Court.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims for violation of the First Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause
Docket Entries
2020-03-09
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-02-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.
2020-02-06
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-09
Waiver of right of respondent Beal Bank to respond filed.
2019-09-16
Attorneys
Beal Bank
Dora Faye Kaufman — Liebler, Gonzalez & Portuondo, Respondent
Samuel Mohorne
Samuel C. Mohorne — Petitioner