1.
Whether it denies defendant's Fourteenth and Thirteenth Amendment Rights while on
direct review not to retroactively vacate a non-unanimous jury verdict, when a state
constitutional provision becomes effective requiring unanimos jury verdids for conviction?

2.
Whether it denies pro se defendant Sixth Amendment Right to a speedy trial and right to
counsel of choice, when defendant is incarcerated over 120 days and denied self representation
without a Faretta Hearing?

3.
Whether it denied the Fourteenth Amendment and First Amendment Right to Freedom of
Religion to force pro se incarcerated defendants by restraints to appear and participate in trial; on
defendant's "Holy Sabbath Day" Saturday, a non-regular court date, without the aid of counsel?

4.
Whether it is a nullity, Obstruction of Justice and a denial of a fair hearing when judgesEn Banc subject to an unresolved Recusal Motion deliberately have proceedings prior to Recusal
Motion?

5.
Whether it violates defendant's Fourteenth Amendment Right, when Clerk of Court
violates allottment Rules of the Court to allow Judge-Shopping?

6.
Whether it is a denial of the Sixth Amendment Rights, when incarcerated, Pro Se
defendants are denied a defense Expert Witness on the very day of trial?

7.
Whether it denies defendant Fourteenth and Nineth Amendment Rights reserved to the
people, when the defendant 's challenge to the State and Court's "status " and "jurisdiction "
remains unresolved by hearing before commencement of trial?

8.
Whether it is inherently unfair and in bad faith and denial of the Fifth and Fourteenth
Amendment, to supply two-opposite theories of prosecution simultaneously driven by Gender
disciminative Motives*

9.
Whether it denied defendant's Fourth and Eighth Amendments, Defendant's husband and
wife, arrested three separate times, same case, circumstances, material evidence, third arrest no
warrant, judgment of forfeiture or previous bonds revoked. Six bonds totalling 4 million dollars
unretumed and non-re instated, illegal seizure and excessive bonds and fines.

Whether it denies defendant's Fourteenth and Thirteenth Amendment Rights while on direct review not to retroactively vacate a non-unanimous jury verdict, when a state constitutional provision becomes effective requiring unanimous jury verdicts for conviction?