1. Does appeals court 's dismissal finding 2 reliefs but no known cause show
the appeals court is misrepresenting the facts?
2. Did the appeals court establish jurisdiction over the subject matter when
claiming my complaint accurately makes "two vague requests for relief '
but fails to reference its following cause ["who then determines the owner 's
life style, pursuit of happiness, desired health status, elimination of pain
and suffering, service safety, reasonable costs, contracting according to the
desires of the person of interest identified or (on) the property ownership
conveyance instrument 1?
3. Do the 151 complaint words, show the appeals court failed to establish
jurisdiction over me by their bias and intent to refuse to search for any
cause of action?
4. Did the appeals court establish jurisdiction over corporate VP Herbert,
appellee, impersonating a state governor?
5. Did the replacement appeals judges have jurisdiction to strike the
original assigned judges ' order that I may argue my motion giving appellee
standing at the appeals level and without any opposition?
6. Did the replacement appeals judges have jurisdiction to strike the
original assigned judges ' order that I may argue my motion that judges
recuse who have ruled upon Utah 's Amendment 3 establishing a marriage
between a man and a woman, our equity court 's common law in Art 3.2?
7. Does the replacement appeals judge 's dismissal show failure to read my
briefs or become knowledgeable of the facts before adjudicating?
8. Did the replacement appeals judges copy district court 's adjudication
without reading any documents prior to ruling to follow the district
brethren, i.e., every priesthood leader is an island and no island interferes
with the law of another island?
9. Does the replacement appeals judges order come directly from district
court 's order instead of the briefs submitted at the appeals level?
10. Did district court 's order calling my complaint and motions a brief, as
done at the appeals level, trigger appeals shadow members to act as the
supreme court instead of an appeals court to deter appealing to the real
supreme court?
1 l.Does the district court 's dismissal show a predetermined decision had
been rendered instead of adjudication upon the subject matter when my
motions were mooted to not have to be read?
12. Does our ratified constitution reference her republic form of
government as a corporation?
13. Did Dartmouth v Woodward authorize application of "corporation " to
government?
14. Does the existence of a CORPORATE seat of government, Act of 1871,
instead of a republic form of government seat, show 2 governments, 2
constitutions, and 2 presidents govern America, where the shadow
government is calling more shots than the republic government?
15. Did the Act of 1871 's corporate seat of government recognize and
accommodate a foreign government operating upon American soil without
jurisdiction to do so making the corporate seat repugnant to the
constitution?
16. Did Amendment 17 inform states that "ratification is state consent to
give up her senate suffrage? "
17. Did A. 17 conquer all 50 states in 1913 by causing states to believe they
no longer have their senate suffrage given to a 2nd senate house elected by
the people?
18. Has there been any reference to- "We the people of the united
congress

Does appeals court's dismissal finding 2 reliefs but no known cause show the appeals court is misrepresenting the facts?