1. Is Jeffrey L. Harris entitled to a Certificate of Appeal Is Jeffrey Harris entitled to a Pinholster Hearing to Drov „^ rhls ^ial Counsel, Robert S. Sosnay & his Aoppellate Counsel, t.arK LuKoff, were an ineffective assistance of counsel?

2. art.F Can fche Defendant, Jeffrey L. Harris, who did not entere into any conspiracy, nor had any knowledge that a crime be found auilty of Intentional Homicide pursuant to 940.01 and 939.05 Stats., and remain in prison m violation of Laws, Constitution, or Treaties Of Th® United states?ability?

3. Should a new Jury have the right to review Attorney Byron authen- ^^ 1^eS^1ptive memo dated May 9, 2013, and him in person to conclude tnat the interview with Herbert Shropshire is accurate and true that Jeffrey l. Harris had nothing to do with Gervis Myles' death nor the crime of the Great Western Liquor Store?

4. an Jhf.s^ate and District Courts failed in their duty to makean independent finding upon Jeffrey Harris showing that he did not possess any malice nor intent to kill, nor possess any 939.05 elements upon showing the newly discovered evidence verses the old evidence ad duced at his jury trial and allowed Harris to be convicted unlawfully on perjury testimony?

5. Will this United States Supreme Court concur that the contro versy in this case is not fully tried and a miscarriage of justice has occurred in this particular case on appeal?

6. Jeffrey Harris s actual innocent claim the "gateway" forfederal courts and this Supreme Court Of The United States to review his abusive & successive constitutional claims through which a peti tioner may pass whether the impediment is a procedural bar or expira tion of the statutory of limitations for a habeas corpus being barred and in light of the evidence he is truly innocent of the crim Q beyond a reasonable doubt?

7. This is a rare, exceptional, unique, extraordinary case show ing a genuine claim that Jeffrey L. Harris is "Actually Innocence" of the alleged homicide and attempted armed robbery which was a "Theft Case" that led to Gervis Myles' death and show "cause", "prejudice" that offends fundamental principles of justice where the State Courts, Eastern District Court and the Seventh Circuit Court Of Appeals ignored to grant a new trial and refused to abide by its own statutory commands depriving Harris of protected Fourteenth and the Sixth as well as the 8th Amendment Right _rendering Harris's Constitutional (Fundamental Unfairly) and causing him to remain in prison unconstitutionally?

8. ^arr -*-s ^-s entitled to a Writ Of Certiorari and Habeas Corpus Relief as a matter of law in the Interest Of Justice

Is Jeffrey L. Harris entitled to a Certificate of Appealability?