Whether Dudenhoeffer's "context-sensitive scrutiny of a complaint's allegations" can be met where a court presumes an asset must be prudent if it is publicly traded and presumes that a reasonably prudent fiduciary would never conclude that it "would not do more harm than good" to freeze purchases of a company's assets based on inside information.

Whether Dudenhoeffer's 'context-sensitive scrutiny of a complaint's allegations' can be met where a court presumes an asset must be prudent if it is publicly traded and presumes that a reasonably prudent fiduciary would never conclude that it 'would not do more harm than good' to freeze purchases of a company's assets based on inside information