No. 19-5940

Scott Peters v. Young Sun Kim

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-09-13
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights criminal-procedure damages due-process equal-protection habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ninth-circuit post-conviction standing state-court
Latest Conference: 2019-11-15
Question Presented (from Petition)

Petitioner Questions whether Discrimination of Equal Opportunity Because of Social Economic To Defend Petitioner Right to Appeal.

Petitioner Questions whether the correct Controlling Precedent was Applied when the District Court Ruled on Petitioner's Complaint.

Petitioner Questions whether His disabled veterans Status Entitles Him to the Level of care V.A. would Provide, and whether He lost His Rights to obtain of the country.

Petitioner Questions whether the District Court Appeals Process as a way to Prevent any Using the

Petitioner Questions whether the District Court Made a good faith Effort to Correctly Adjudicate the Petitioner's complaint or Did not Because of Political Reasons. Due to the fact meous Facts were in Error or Incorrect in His Orders.

Petitioner Questions whether Doctor Kim's Motivations Information Woer HIPAA as Mo Hin or Privileged Disclosure Form or any Form us used. See Doc 97-9 File 83-19-18

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the District Court erred in dismissing Petitioner's claims

Docket Entries

2019-11-18
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2019-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-09-29
Waiver of right of respondent Young S. Kim to respond filed.
2019-09-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 15, 2019)

Attorneys

Scott Peters
Scott Peters — Petitioner
Young S. Kim
Craig Leonard UnrathHeyl, Royster, et al., Respondent