No. 19-5930
Harold Blake v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
Tags: appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability civil-rights constitutional-claims due-process federal-courts habeas-corpus judicial-review jurists-of-reason legal-standard standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-11-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the petitioner has demonstrated that jurists of reason could disagree with the federal courts' resolution of his constitutional claims or that such jurists could conclude that the issues presented are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further, thereby entitling petitioner to the issuance of a COA?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner has demonstrated that jurists of reason could disagree with the federal courts' resolution of his constitutional claims or that such jurists could conclude that the issues presented are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further, thereby entitling petitioner to the issuance of a COA?
Docket Entries
2019-11-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.
2019-10-07
Waiver of right of respondent Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections to respond filed.
2019-08-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 15, 2019)
Attorneys
Harold Blake
Linda McDermott — McClain & McDermott, P.A., Petitioner
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections