No. 19-5917
Matthew A. Castro v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 11th-circuit 5th-amendment 6th-amendment constitutional-rights due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel fact-finding federal-courts fifth-amendment habeas-corpus prosecutorial-misconduct sixth-amendment standard-of-review
Latest Conference:
2019-10-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
1).
Whether the United States Court of Appeal for the Eleventh Circuit
erred by unreasonably determining the facts based on a misreading of the state
records and, by failing to substantiate their opinion with decisional law?
2).
Whether Castro's Constitutional rights, under the
5th
and 6th
Amendments, to due process of law and effective assistance of counsel were
violated.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the United States Court of Appeal for the Eleventh Circuit erred by unreasonably determining the facts based on a misreading of the state records and, by failing to substantiate their opinion with decisional law?
Docket Entries
2019-10-21
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.
2019-09-26
Waiver of right of respondent Inch, Sec., FL DOC, et al. to respond filed.
2019-04-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 11, 2019)
2019-02-14
Application (18A826) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until April 18, 2019.
2019-02-06
Application (18A826) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 17, 2019 to April 18, 2019, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Inch, Sec., FL DOC, et al.
Rebecca Rock McGuigan — Office of Florida Attorney General, Respondent
Matthew Castro
Matthew A. Castro — Petitioner