David Earl Ison v. Richard Brown, Superintendent, Wabash Valley Correctional Facility
1. Wasn't it a threat or promise by the State: Prosecutor wilhelm when he drafted up a document, gave the document to my Attorney him giving it to me if I plead guilty to count vi life with-out parole one qi with-out filing the death penalty? the threat and promise at my Evidentiary hearing (see Evid. H. Transeripte P. 29-101). And wasn't the introduction of oprn Court a violation of .my privilege against by the FiFth Amendment to the United States Constitution; and a violation of Boykin v. Shotwell Supra, Bram U. U.5. 1897, an Aladama, involuntary plea?
Count vi life with-out parole requrst senteneing and not Counts I me ir v the munder charge's for guilt or innocense : and I never waived any of my this going against Boykin v. Alaban Boykins;isnt I never Knew I was waiving thom by pleading p/p person to think they did not have for a reasonable for counts I ll ill iv v the murder the Boykin rights Charges themselue's?
Whether the introduction of a defendant's involuntary plea or statements in violation of the Fifth Amendment's privilege against self-incrimination is a constitutional violation under Boykin v. Alabama