WHETHER PETITIONER WAS DENIED EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL BECAUSE
TRIAL COUNSEL FAILED TO ARGUE 4th CIRCUIT PRECEDENT REGARDING THE
MEANING OF CODE WORDS

WHETHER TESTIMONY FROM AN UNRELIABLE CRIMINAL INFORMANT ON THE
GOVERNMENT'S PAYROLL IS SUFFICIENT TO PRESENT TO A FEDERAL COURT AND
OBTAIN A WARRANT 'TO EAVESDROP ON A CITIZEN

WHETHER PETITIONER
BECAUSE ATTORNEY FAILED TO BRING UP THE INDICTMENT CHARGED ONE
CONSPIRACY WHERE THE EVIDENCE SUGGESTS CONCLUSIVELY SEVERAL
CONSPIRACIES BETWEEN THE CRIMINAL INFORMANTS AND DEFENDANTS

WHETHER PETITIONER HAS ANY VIABLE CLAIMS OF INNEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE
AND HAS-MADE A SUBSTANTIAL SHOWING OF FOURTH, FIFTH AND SIXTH '
AMENDMENT CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS

WHETHER PETITIONER WAS DENIED EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL