No. 19-5892

Charles Titus, et ux. v. Mohammed Alaeddin, et al.

Lower Court: Illinois
Docketed: 2019-09-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure due-process equal-protection fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment judicial-bias pro-se pro-se-parties procedural-due-process standing trial-proceedings
Latest Conference: 2019-11-08
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the trial court's actions - rushing petitioners straight into trial proceedings without affording them with the mandatory procedural due process of S.Ct. Rule 218(a) initial case management conference proceedings, and without first affording them with the mandatory procedural due process of S.Ct. Rule 201(a) full fact discovery, and without first affording them with equal entitlement of S.Ct. Rules 233 - 239 against pro se parties amounts to an unfair trial violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment?

2. Whether the trial court's actions, as described above, against pro se parties amounts to judicial bias in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment?

3. Whether the State of Illinois Third District Appellate Court Should Have Stricken The Respondents' Response Brief?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the trial court's actions amounted to a violation of the Due Process Clause

Docket Entries

2019-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
2019-08-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 10, 2019)

Attorneys

Charles Titus
Charles Titus — Petitioner