Charles Titus, et ux. v. Mohammed Alaeddin, et al.
Whether the trial court's actions - rushing petitioners straight into trial proceedings without affording them with the mandatory procedural due process of S.Ct. Rule 218(a) initial case management conference proceedings, and without first affording them with the mandatory procedural due process of S.Ct. Rule 201(a) full fact discovery, and without first affording them with equal entitlement of S.Ct. Rules 233 - 239 against pro se parties amounts to an unfair trial violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment?
2. Whether the trial court's actions, as described above, against pro se parties amounts to judicial bias in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment?
3. Whether the State of Illinois Third District Appellate Court Should Have Stricken The Respondents' Response Brief?
Whether the trial court's actions amounted to a violation of the Due Process Clause