No. 19-5875
Alfredo Gonzalez-Terrazas v. United States
Tags: alleyne almendarez-torres appellate-procedure apprendi constitutional-interpretation criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process judicial-review precedent-analysis sentencing supreme-court-review
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether this Court should consider the continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998), in light of the reasoning of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether this Court should consider the continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998), in light of the reasoning of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (20183)
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2019-12-30
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2019-11-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 29, 2019 to December 30, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-11-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 30, 2019.
2019-10-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 29, 2019.
2019-10-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 30, 2019 to November 29, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-09-30
Response Requested. (Due October 30, 2019)
2019-09-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-09-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-09-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 9, 2019)
Attorneys
Alfredo Gonzalez-Terrazas
Judy Fulmer Madewell — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent