(1) Was the arbitrary refusal, on June 26, 2019, by the district court, to adjudicate Kaul's twenty-two (22) motions for summary judgment, a consequence of the district court's admitted acts of judicial corruption, a 'Fraud on the Court'.

(2) Whether this Court should reverse the 'Fraud on the Court', by ordering the case be opened and Kaul's twenty-two (22) motions for summary judgment be adjudicated, in order to prevent prejudice to Kaul.

Whether the district court's arbitrary refusal to adjudicate the petitioner's 22 motions for summary judgment was a consequence of judicial corruption and a 'fraud on the court', and whether the Supreme Court should reverse this 'fraud on the court' by ordering the case reopened and the motions adjudicated to prevent prejudice to the petitioner