I. Whether the Order of Dismissal with Prejudice as an Acquittance provides preclusive and legal force, requiring Vacatur; Whether various violations of the Confrontation Clause violated Petitioner's due process rights and impaired the jury right to fair deliberation, requiring Vacatur.

2. Whether constitutional violations as fundamental error arose when the district court subverted witness testimony and improperly qualified use of a conscious avoidance jury instruction, requiring Vacatur.

3. Whether the government's failure to disclose Brady material, including a waiver of attorney client privilege, only made a constitutional violation, requiring Vacatur.

4. Whether the Order of Dismissal with Prejudice as an Acquittance, and use of incorrect statute at sentencing, demand that Petitioner's sentence be immediately corrected to remove sentence enhancements.

Whether the Sense of Remized Plea Bargaining Acceptance provides exclusive Sixth Amendment right, requiring VACATUR