No. 19-5822
Ronald Tuttle v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction certiorari civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-interpretation constitutional-provisions due-process judicial-procedure jurisdiction jurisdictional-issues standing supervisory-powers supreme-court-review the-supreme-court
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Decide An Important Fedaral Qvestios In A WAy THAT
Conflicts With Relevant Decisions af Supreme Souct?
D Did The Vaited States CourtofAppeals for The Second Circuit
Depart Fron The Accepted Aad Usual Course of Judicial
Proceadings By Sanctioning
A Departure By A Lower
Court Allowing For Suprame Souct To Exercise Its
Supervisor
.
$3) Did The Unitad States Courtof Appeals for The Serond Circuit
Decide On An Important Qvestion ot Federal Law
That Has Not Beer, But should Be Setted By
The Supreme Court?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the United States Supreme Court err in denying the petition for writ of certiorari
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-11-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-10-29
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-09-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-05-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 4, 2019)
2019-05-22
Application (18A1212) granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until September 2, 2019.
2019-05-13
Application (18A1212) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 2, 2019 to August 31, 2019, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.
Attorneys
Ronald Tuttle
Ronald Tuttle — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent