No. 19-5821
Robert Earl Robinson v. Arizona, et al.
IFP
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction appellate-review brady-v-maryland civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-defense criminal-procedure cross-examination discovery due-process exculpatory-evidence prosecutorial-misconduct sixth-amendment standing statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2019-11-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Should the verdict be reversed because the plea was not entered into knowingly intelligently and voluntarily?
Did the prosecution violate Brady requirements in interviewing the eye witness to the incident?
Was Counsel's performance ineffective and defiant to the Proceedings?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated when the state failed to disclose exculpatory evidence prior to trial
Docket Entries
2019-11-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.
2019-06-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 7, 2019)
Attorneys
Robert Earl Robinson
Robert Robinson — Petitioner