In United States v. Davis , 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019), this Court held that 18 U.S.C. §
924(c)(3)(B), which defines "crime of violence," is unconstitut ionally vague. In affirming
Petitioner's conviction for violating 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), the a ppellate court relied on the
unconstitutionally vague definition in § 924(c)(3)(B). W h e r e t h e a p p e l l a t e c o u r t a f f i r m e d
Petitioner's conviction in reliance on the unconstitutional sta tute, should this case be remanded to
the appellate court for further consideration in light of Davis ?

Whether the appellate court's reliance on the unconstitutionally vague definition of 'crime of violence' in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(B) requires remand for further consideration in light of United States v. Davis