No. 19-580

Jun Xiao v. Regents of the University of Minnesota, et al.

Lower Court: Minnesota
Docketed: 2019-11-04
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Relisted (2)
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process Fourteenth Amendment equal-protection qualified-immunity civil-rights due-process equal-protection first-amendment fourteenth-amendment property-rights qualified-immunity section-1983 standing takings
Latest Conference: 2020-03-06 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the state district court erred in dismissing Petitioner's 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Fourteenth Amendment equal protection claim for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be grated.

Whether the lower courts, given the facts, wrongfully employed and misapplied a heightened scrutiny standard rather than the deferential Turner standard? See Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987).

Whether the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments can prevail a state status (Minn. Stat. § 606.01) when deciding whether students can be awarded monetary relief for their property damages (education right is a property right).

Whether students at a state-owned university should have the same federal legal rights as students at private universities when state-owned university students suffered property loss.

Whether maliciously acting government officials should be awarded "qualified immunity" in terms of First Amendment retaliation.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the state district court erred in dismissing Petitioner's 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Fourteenth Amendment equal protection claim for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted

Docket Entries

2020-03-09
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-02-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.
2020-02-06
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-10-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 4, 2019)

Attorneys

Jun Xiao
Jun Xiao — Petitioner