DID TRIAL ATTORNEY PRE-TRIAL ZEEE CVE 1E HE TARAUEN 11S onl Me LIGENGE. BY WAITING 720 Lott, FAILED 70 SECURE AN EXPERT WITNESS ON LINE-UP TbéAr7 ~Ficarzen, Witcw WAS THEMES FLECE OF EVIDENCE 771RT ULTIMATELY Tek. (UNEDUCATED THIS SCIENCE) TORY Uae 70Finlb His Berd ? DOES THE COURT BELIEVE THACHIAD THE "JURY BERN EDUCATED ON HoW 70s SPECIELC SCIENCE Ficroks wire RéGAebiale 716

2. TENTIAL LACK OF CREDIBILITY OF THE EVE WITNESS, THUT THEE. 1S A REASONIRELE PROBABIL ar 'wietaprorecne?

3. Arkh broker PReswbreimly Tlcerecr we LF He FAD TO OB SERIO THE... IN-couer ERENr IE LcATIOMl OF HE PETITIONER BY THENICIM WHEN, THE DEYECTIVE Mio. CentbuscrED THE SUBSEQUENT Pore LiMé-UP Phoceburé, NEF: SHUplé? AbMimeb ti His ROBABGE CAUSE SzreMenlC THAT AE WAS 1N] PSONE Conmracy: WITH THE EHEWITIVES § (MS. Kacer. WAWLE SHA WAS Ar-EAs srArin//Srke MoMéntrs BLEARE SHE REVIEWED THE SURVELLANee COM 'ERA SUOMING THE. PEAZITONER'S IDLO WAGE MAKue A PURCHASE,

4. WHAT ARE THE PARAMETERS OF ALLOWABLE ZDENTUFICATION EXPERT TESTIMONY INA CASE LIKE TBUS ? 5 IT FAR/IRUER 76 SUSY ARBITRARILY RULE Jo LANA TRI SUCH WOULD) Nor BEALLONED Ar 7RIL Wirtiur EVEN Hotline A HEARIWE OM 17, of Comsin&One A MoTioy © howby "T AN ED EXPERTS ZESTIMWY HAVE BEARING NOT ONLY ON THE ENEWINNESS es TESTIMONY ALONE BUT ALSO. ON A DETE CITES Cin THI8 cas) RES PORIS /BILIT VEST CONDLEr A CLEAN |Home Linea? RRCERRE — DESCRIBING Wi SCLENITEIC TEKS THE PRATPAS OF IMPRINTING AND StcW OCCURING IF THE PROCEDURE 15 ConbuereD mapkofeeLy ° Shop N'T TARY BEMLOWED ATIRIAL ¢

5. CAN A RESPONDENT INVOKE TRIAL SrRATEGY FOR AN ATORNEY EVEN NHEN TH «lier ARE 7a Dnscaueky Respomsyérermes CFA PROSECUTORS OFFLEIN THE INSrANvE OF A Line-Up PRocERURE Pate y CHANbe BY 1775 RELANIVE PaLIcé

Whether the trial attorney's pre-trial failure to secure an expert witness on eyewitness identification, which was the key piece of evidence that ultimately led the (uneducated) jury to find the petitioner guilty, violated the petitioner's due process rights