No. 19-5760
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process judicial-procedure mental-health standing supreme-court-precedent waiver-of-rights
Latest Conference:
2019-11-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. DID THE APPELMTE DIVISION VIOLATE CLEARLY ESTABLISHED FEDERAL
SUPREME COURT RATIFIED LAW ?
2. DID THE LOWER COURT OVERLOOK DEFENDANTS SIGNIFICANT MENTAL HEALTH
ISSUES ?
3. DID MR. TOURE VAIDLY WAIVE HIS RIGHT TO APPEAL WHEN THE WRITTEN
WAIVER USED UNENFORCEABLE LANGUAGE AND THE COURTS ALLOCUTION DID
NOT CURE THE DEFECT ?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the appellate division violate clearly established federal supreme court ratified law?
Docket Entries
2019-11-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.
2019-09-26
Waiver of right of respondent New York to respond filed.
2019-06-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 30, 2019)
Attorneys
Aly Toure
Aly Toure — Petitioner
New York
Waleska Suero Garcia — Bronx County District Attorney's Office, Respondent