WHETHER PETITIONER'S 3167 MONTH SENTENCE IMPOSED AS A RESULT OF THIS COURT'S MISINTERPRETATION OF THE STACKING PROVISIONS OF 18 U.S.C. 924(c)(1)(A)(i) IS CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT PARTICULARLY IN LIGHT OF THE FIRST STEP ACT'S DESCRIPTION OF THE AMENDMENT AS A CLARIFICATION OF THE ORIGINAL MEANING OF 924(c)(1)(A)(i) DECLARING THE INTENT OF CONGRESS WAS TO MAKE THE STACKING PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO FINAL CONVICTIONS ONLY?

Whether petitioner's 3167 month sentence imposed as a result of this court's misinterpretation of the stacking provisions of 18 U.S.C. 924(c)(1)(A) is cruel and unusual punishment