No. 19-5737

Jerome Burnam v. Pennsylvania

Lower Court: Pennsylvania
Docketed: 2019-08-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights court-reasoning due-process judicial-procedure mandamus meaningful-opportunity-to-seek-redress re-sentencing reasons reasons-on-the-record record redress sentence-imposition writ-of-mandamus
Latest Conference: 2019-11-08 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

Where the issue involves the Constitutionality of the statue of the Commonwealth.

I. Whether Writ of Mandamus jurisdiction was abridged or if this Petitioner's Due Process Rights were Denied to Meaningful opportunity to seek Redress, for an issue surrounding Re-sentencing, when Re-sentencing Court failed to State its Reasons on the Record for the Imposition of its Sentence ?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Writ of Mandamus jurisdiction was abridged or if this Petitioner's Due Process Rights were Denied to Meaningful opportunity to seek Redress, for an issue surrounding Re-sentencing, when Re-sentencing Court failed to State its Reasons on the Record for the Imposition of its Sentence

Docket Entries

2019-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
2019-09-19
Rescheduled.
2019-09-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-09-03
Waiver of right of respondent Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to respond filed.
2019-06-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 27, 2019)

Attorneys

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Francesco L. NepaAllegheny County Office of the District Attorney, Respondent
Jerome Burnam
Jerome Burnam — Petitioner