1. If the courts are to regard the Constitution and the Constitution is superior to any ordinary
act of the legislature, is it the Constitution, and not such ordinary act, that must govern
this case to which they both apply?

2. Is it constitutional for a judge to issue an order that service is to be in accordance with
Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and then proceed with the case, issuing a
Bench Warrant for the defendant 's failure to appear, knowing that the plaintiff failed to
effect service?

3. Is it constitutional for Commissioner of Internal Revenue to seek remedy, from a
consumer who has no contract with Commissioner, which is inconsistent with the
Internal Revenue Code of which the Commissioner must abide?

Is the Constitution or an ordinary act of the legislature superior?