No. 19-5706
James Gregory Armistead v. Laura P. Watson, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-state-relations standing takings workforce-investment
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER COURT OF APPEALS CIRCUIT COURT ERROR FOR DENYING PETITIONER'S 42 U.S.C. § 1983 CLAIM AS TIME-BARRED WHEN PETITIONER'S CLAIMS IS BASED ON ALSO PETITIONER'S INJUNCTION, CLAIM WAS BASED ON WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT AGREEMENT CONTRACT 28 U.S.C.§ 1346(a)(2) 2. Tucker Act.
WHETHER CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL'S ERROR FOR DENYING PETITIONER'S CLAIM FOR FAILS TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH HELD STATE'S AND FEDERAL AGENCY NEGLIGENCE FOR HIS INCARCERATION BY THE FULFILLUM OF AN LEGALLY BINDING WORKFORCE AGREEMENT
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court of Appeals erred in denying petitioners' claim as time-barred
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-09-03
Waiver of right of respondents Laura P. Watson, et al. to respond filed.
2019-08-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 23, 2019)
Attorneys
James G. Armistead
James G. Armistead — Petitioner
Laura P. Watson, et al.
Clarence Joe DelForge III — N.C. Department of Justice, Respondent