ISSUE I Does the Alabama State standard of review in Rule 32 Ala.R.Crim.P. post-conviction proceedings regarding the mental disease/defect issue as presented violate the Rule 32 petitioner's Due Process under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution?

ISSUE II Does the Ytandard of review used by the Northern District Court of Alabama and the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals regarding the mental disease/defect as presented, violate clearly ektablished Federal Law and the United States Wonstitution as held by the United States Supreme Court?

Does the Alabama State standard of review in Rule 32 Ala.R.Crim.P. post-conviction proceedings regarding the mental disease/defect issue as presented violate the Rule 32 petitioner's Due Process under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution?