1. By what authority did you base your actions on when having the Petitioner
confined at Texas Civil Commitment Center?

2. What evidence was relied upon as basis to "seize " Petitioner and return him to
custody at Texas Civil Commitment Center?

3. Are you aware that Petitioner involuntary conversion (at the time of
commission) effectively disregards his "Final Judgment, " officially rendered in
the 435 th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas? [Judge P.K. Reiter
Presiding].

4. By what authority have you overridden Petitioner "Final Judgment " rendered
by "Judge Reiter?

5. Did you present newly discovered evidence at hearing or trial, upon which your
seizure of Petitioner is justifiable?

6. If so, what is the controlling question of law, which represents said justification?

7. Do you consider your actions taken against Petitioner reasonable consideration
shown for his "Liberty Interest "?

8. Was Petitioner duly notified of you filing an "interlocutory appeal, " in order to
stay the Judgment rendered by "Judge P.K. Reiter? "

9. If so, are you aware of the fact that "Petitioner was denied an opportunity to
make an appeal bond "?

10. Do you believe "Judge P.K. Reiter " rendered an equitable decision on behalf
of the Petitioner, thereby releasing him from "Civil Commitment?

11. If not, why do you feel that this decision (made) is wrong and therefore had to
be appealed immediately?

12 Was Petitioner considered "High-Risk while residing at the Avalon halfwayHouse in Dallas Texas? "

13. "If so, what was the reason? "

14. "If not, why not? "

15. Why was Petitioner still considered a threat to the Community "when he was
not considered High-Risk to reoffend? "

16. Can the State of Texas (lawfully) override and indivisible contract [Petitioner
Final Judgment and order of commitment, hereinafter referred to as Final
Judgment and order of Commitment] by novation (substitution of contract) and
thereby rely upon an Amended Court Order which conflicts with Petitioner valid
Final Judgment and Order Commitment [contract] rendered in a competent Court
of law? Marbury v. Madison (1803).

17. Can the State of Texas (lawfully) enact retrospective law that results in
repudiation of its contractual obligation to Petitioner, when to do so substantially
impair said contract and thereby impacts both Petitioner life and liberty interest?
Calder v. Bull (1798).

18. Is it lawful for the State of Texas to abuse its Sovereign power via overbroad
use of the United States Constitution, [Tenth Amendment] with the necessary and
proper Clause to deny and disparage Petitioner Civil Rights, thereby relegating him
to Status as a second-class citizen by the gross encroachment upon the federal
constitutions [Ninth Amendment]? Griswold v. Connecticut (1965).

19. Can the Texas Civil Commitment Act, as amended under Senate Bill 746, be
considered Civil, Remedial and non-punitive under ''intents effects scrutiny" ?
Premier Pabst Co v. Gross cup (1936).

20. Can a Trial Court issue an Order that is inconsistent with Petitioner Final
Judgment and thereby constitutes a material Breach

Whether the State of Texas lawfully overrode the petitioner's final judgment and order of commitment, in violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause, Double Jeopardy Clause, and Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause