Curtis Lee Sheppard, Jr. v. Texas
1. IF THE TRIAL COURT LACKED JURTEDICTIOON DECTION TO SETTHE CONVECTION -JUDGMENT AEIDE AND DEEMISETHELAUSE.
2. THE TREAL COURT /THE COURT OF CREMONAL APPEALE LF TEXAE EUACTED AN STORED WRIT N.19,359-01IN CAUENO.24,780-B-1ENCE "5AUUARY 4, 1989"BT TR.C.NO.48,489-- 2-9, WR-19,359-2-25 COLLUDNFTREAE
3. SUBJECT -MATTER JURCEDECTION MAY BE CHALENGED AT ANYTIME, BEFORE, DURQUG OR AFTER TRIAL AND A JURCEDECTEONAL CHALLEUCE UF THCETY PE NEVERCELEMETED, SINCE IT GOEE TO THE FOUNDATD OF WHETER PETETSONER'S CASE COULD BE TROED IN THE FIRST PLACE
4. THE COLLOQUY OF THE TRIAL COURT/ THE COURT OF CROMDUALAPPEALE OF TEXAE 032 RULDUGS "CE DOCUMENTED IN IT'S OWN COURT RECORDE AWD IE ANACTUF TREASON, JUREEDECTIDN OWCE YOU CHALLENCE 'S A CRCMEUKL CAEE THE T8TH DEETR IN Ict UNDER 28U.s.CE5561d1"
Whether the trial court lacked the authority to set aside the conviction and dismiss the cause