No. 19-5649

Terry Lee O'Brien v. Carla Hacker-Agnew, Warden, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-08-21
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights deliberate-indifference due-process eighth-amendment medical-negligence national-uniformity obstruction-of-justice prison-conditions standing statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference: 2019-10-18
Question Presented (from Petition)

To what degree for interpretation of a constitution, statute, rule and regulation is a question of law for consideration by the Supreme Court is necessary to secure and maintain Governing precedent laws. Where there may be no Published cases argued in law or fact over the opportunity for the Supreme Court to create laws governing the utilization of new methods of interference. In the Nations Institutions for the futures.

To what degree for interpretation of a constitution, Statute or authority law is a question of law where there is CRISES case. Laws of substantial rule of national application for the totality sustaining witnesses, obstructs surveillance and conducts recording and where one of these things that each defendant does in overt acts in furtherance of an offense adds up to create an total overall effect of an ancient Composition of harassment, violation and obstruction of Justice for NSS days consecutive in which there is an overriding need for National Uniformity?

To what degree for interpretation of a constitution statute or authority of case law is a Question of law where Prison officials and doctors violate the Amendment by being deliberate indifferent to prisons exposure to a serious medical need presenting a high degree overall excessive risk of harm or danger whether

Question Presented (AI Summary)

What degree of interpretation of a constitution, statute, or authority of law is a question of law where there is a crisis case?

Docket Entries

2019-10-21
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.
2019-06-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 20, 2019)
2019-04-19
Application (18A1069) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until June 23, 2019.
2019-03-05
Application (18A1069) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 24, 2019 to June 23, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

Terry L. O'Brien
Terry L. O'Brien — Petitioner