No. 19-5647

Kenneth Randale Door v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-08-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: aiding-and-abetting crimes-of-violence criminal-statutory-provisions force-clause sentencing-guidelines state-criminal-offenses statutory-interpretation statutory-provisions substantive-criminal-offenses washington
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether a state aiding and abetting statute that is broader than generic aiding and abetting and incorporated within the state's substantive criminal offenses prevents those state criminal offenses from qualifying as "crimes of violence" under the "force clause" used in the sentencing guidelines and various criminal statutory provisions.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a state aiding and abetting statute that is broader than generic aiding and abetting and incorporated within the state's substantive criminal offenses prevents those state criminal offenses from qualifying as 'crimes of violence' under the 'force clause' used in the sentencing guidelines and various criminal statutory provisions

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-08-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 19, 2019)

Attorneys

Kenneth Door
Carlton Frederick GunnAttorney at Law, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent