When the district court expressly relies upon a clearly erroneous fact in selecting its sentence, is the error harmless if there are other factors in the record that would support the overall sentence? Did the Eleventh Circuit misapply harmless error review under Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(a) in a manner that is contrary this Court's precedent announced in Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38 (2007), Williams v. United States, 503 U.S. 193, 203 (1992), Molina Martinez v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 1338 (2016), and Rosales-Mireles v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 1897 (2018)?

Whether the district court's reliance on a clearly erroneous fact in selecting the defendant's sentence was harmless error