No. 19-56
Mark Milner, et al. v. Vincent Mares, Executive Director, New Mexico Racing Commission, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: 42-U.S.C.-§-1983 42-usc-1983 civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process government-accountability harlow-v-fitzgerald new-mexico qualified-immunity
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the lower courts err in dismissing Petitioners' cases on the basis of Qualified Immunity in the face of US Supreme Court precedent and New Mexico jurisprudence clearly establishing the right that was violated?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the lower courts err in dismissing Petitioners' cases on the basis of Qualified Immunity in the face of US Supreme Court precedent and New Mexico jurisprudence clearly establishing the right that was violated?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-15
Waiver of right of respondents Vincent Mares, et al. to respond filed.
2019-06-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 8, 2019)
Attorneys
Mark Milner, et al.
Vincent Mares, et al.
Stephen Samuel Hamilton — Montgomery & Andrews, P.A., Respondent