THIS THIS HONORABLE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT HAVE THE POWER TO;
[A] Dismiss the case and discharge relator where the case itself is against law
as been made by one who had no jurisdiction over subject matter of the
case/cause which makes it evident that, an lack of. subject matter
jurisdiction, cease to exist warranting the court to declare the law and
■ announce the fact?

Whether the Supreme Court has the power to dismiss a case and discharge the relator where the case itself is against the law, as has been made by one who had no jurisdiction over the subject matter of the case/cause, which makes it evident that the lack of subject matter jurisdiction ceases to exist, warranting the court to declare the law and announce the fact?