Frank Stephon Johnson v. Correct Care Solutions, et al.
was the defendonts conduct de\ therately ,Pucposely Knowing nd cbjecluely yu intera' in Respect to Vv ialating Johnson rcHottonal Vio S Fourteen 1 Amendment GQ nd fal ath Jnendiment
[First Question] "las the defendants deliberat be indifference to Johnson serious medical neecl s aa
[Second Queskion] "Did the "Ord the defendnts Subiect Johnsen toa form OF putishment bn yng. lockcupunitshiatoe bis an lack-up foe tbehaviac Problems inte. facili Rather} Ow put. Srhnonin amedical unit foe his conditions?
[Thir tio ond dbjecively Unrencandole 2"
[Fes uth Q restion] "Did fre, ASenclanks Violecke.s hasan Constitutional Right Fourteenth
Whether the defendants' deliberate indifference to the petitioner's serious medical needs violated the Eighth Amendment