1.) Whether Petitioner stated a Valid Constitutional Claim when he asserted that on January 22,2008,the federal detainer deprived him of his liberty Interest In posting a set probation bail [when] the federal Government took him a way from the state custody and place him In federal[detainer]custody for federal prosecution for five (5)months.

2.) Whether[when]a federal sentencing judge Remain silent on how a sentence should In a state jail or state prison run and the petitioner Request for time served to be credited toward his federal sentence from October 18,2007, the date the state arrested on the state offenses through up until march 26,2014, the date he entered B.O.P.custody[due]to the federal detainer[a]lone on january 22,2008, prevented the petitioner release from state confinement[did]the Eleventh Circuit Violate .HEGNEY V. HOLDER .177 fed.App'x 901(llth Cir 2006 U.S.App.Lexis 10148) ; an SHAW V. SMIT H 680 f.2d 1104(5th Cir. 1982 U.S.App.Lexis 17167), When it failed to [grant] the Requested jail credit toward the petitioner's federal sentence.

3.) Whether the Eleventh Circuit Violated HEGNEY V. HOLDER 177 fed. App'x 901(11th Cir. 2006 U.S.App. Lexis 10148 ;an SHAW V.SM ITH 680 f.2d 1104(llth Cir. 1982 U.S.App. Lexis 17167) .When it failed to Reinstate petitioner Appeal based on the federal detainer[a]lone prevented the state from releasing the petitioner on bail.

Whether the federal detainer deprived the petitioner of his liberty interest in posting a set probation bail on January 22, 2008