No. 19-5537
IFP
Tags: 6th-amendment appellate-review constitutional-provisions constitutional-rights criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-defects-indictment due-process indictment jurisdiction motion-to-close motion-to-quash sixth-amendment trial-court
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-10-11
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Did the Trial court err When it overruled Appellants Motion to Quash the Amended indictment ? Cih.3t.38. RRY.7).
2. Oid the court of Appeals err by not handing down a written opinion on Appellants Motion to Quush The Amended indictment.?
3. Is a Motion to Quash the indictment a proper vehicle for alerting the trial count of defects on face of indictments?
4. Constitutional Right. Amendment vI.?
5. Did the trial court violate defendunts 14th Amend. U.s. ConsT. Due Process of Law by denieing Petitioners Motion to Qucsh?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Trial Court err when it overruled Appellants Motion to Quash the Amended Indictment?
Docket Entries
2019-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-08-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 9, 2019)
Attorneys
Benjamin Escobedo
Benjamin Escobedo — Petitioner