1. Does an attorney in the practice of representing
proposed adult conservatees/wards have direct
standing , associational standing, or traditional thirdparty standing under Title II of the Americans With
Disabilities Act, § 504 of the Reha bilitation Act, or 42
U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 to challenge a state 's adult
conservatorship / guardianship practice s, laws ,
facially, or as applied, as being in violation of these
statutes, or the due process or equal protectio n
clauses of the 14th Amendment to the United States
Constitution, when the attorney alleges an
independent injury causally related to the alleged
denial of federally required services to the attorney 's
client under these statutes?

2. Does the Rooker-Feldman doctrine prevent
litiga nts from seeking a federal remedy for alleged
violations of their constitutional rights where the
violator is alleged t o have so far succeeded in
corrupt ing the state judicial process as to ob tain a
favorab le state judgment against that federal litig ant?

3. Does the Rooker-Feldman jurisdictional bar not
apply to a claim, it would otherwise apply to, when
the f edera l claim ant ha d no reasonable opportunity to
raise the claim in r elevant state court proceedings?

Does an attorney have standing to challenge a state's adult conservatorship/guardianship practices?