In Re Charlene Terry-Ann Walker Rosa
1. Whother this Entine Cake hat resulted in a Wongu Lack of Knci ledge and underAanding g The Law, facts, Meles and Aatute constitute a centigy question g great pubic in pont ance for the interest of Justice toe senle. and or Whether depense Counsel Could claim Reasonable Thial Aradegy to Ese La Knaude andundanding og the Lal , a and tatute.
2. To col mon b h i ndht uh he all Pelitioner set this whole course g action in motion by asking outchto go get her money efanish petitioner as a pincipal to a fust degree Munder under section 17. oll or a leader included ffense f thirddegee murder. () en denying habers compus, the disthict count finds that defense Counsed theory to the Jury was an ad mission to thurd degnee Murder and not Firt degree munder therefone counels decrsenwas a reasnate Trial Arategy. The cepligy ouertion is whether the distnict count apply tmaproper Aandard to Excuse defense counsel uncenstitutienality that place pelitiner as a Cofelon with Dutch which estallish her as a principal under sectien 77. oll and Eguallyas Killed the Victi.and To Excue his Lack g uncwledge and under Atanding of the Law, Facts, rule, and tatute.
3. Whather Third degnee Munder is a lenaer included Iffense of a Kyt degree munder Committed upen an elderly person er digablhed adult asthe allged Vidun in this cohe was in her to's. (b) Whether tnial counsel could clain Reasenalle trial underotanding g th Law, fauts, rules, end statate f Third degnee surder.
4. Whether the Jury Insructin and Vendict fom contt dene couse heony to e Jur that Pelitoner Cause the Victirs death. (b) whether petitioners Sury thial was Fund amentally un fair and her conviction and peent onpinement Violates her Sixth Amendment night to Coundel.
5. Whether the was Entiely depuied og Impantial Jury and and ter phesent confinenent and cenviction is unconsitutoisal.
6. Whether thene oit due pross and Equal protectien g the Law Violatiens and her Conviction and present Confnement and to be treated Favrly.
7. Whether there ex it a Brady Violatin Excupatory Evidence asto factual Shaving f Identigication as to the factual element on Conviction Necossiate rellersal a conviction and desors protection fuons dowble jeopardy.
8. Wh Brad tnendi pto Scc
Whether the Blue Caste that rested on a Wrongful Conviction of an innocent person because of Ineffective Counsel Lack Knowledge and Understanding of the Law, Rules, and Practices Conflicts to Modify Jurisdiction and Public Defender Policies, for the Sake of Subjects to Serve Long or Taken Depressions