Are inccrcerated plaintiffs m civil coses in corcercted fro se U.S. Distriet Cout cnfairl trected, cadlar in prejedd agoinst, becaule they ore not giva notice of The thirty days requiement of Fed. Reles. Ain. Proc. Rl 4(0) (nor Rle Z6()) nor 28 u.5.(. 2107(c), dismising the Distrit Cut order Cose, a or prvited by the clerk in the some endee os the doe wde, or a differ eavelepe withm sevn dor of the firot ennlpe?

Ar inccrcerated plartiffs Ciwil Cases $\rt$ se m us. Dritriet Cut urfair freated, c-dlor discrimnakd i aseinst because XLer Cren7 prnded -nor fold of ther F.R.C.P.)in The envebpe miled by the clerk wtah includes fhe order of disressol or a seperotty- mailed ennelope witn sevn dol of st first on; nor pocided orl notre of law fo ob ton them?

A Shoud the u.s. Supreme Aipo fno Ru6 27()(z) 41-9 givinS inccrcerated s(Re se CNI litisorts notre m on order desmpssivs a cole cnslor moterral produadlprvited by The clerk; susplemertery of The etrsfence 5 il FRN 4(a)" cad FRAP 24(6)" fnd t 28 U,5.C.2107(0)" 2 3.B) 3A '{ If 1( sbuld the is texts s23 The chove. rules stafate be meluded?

the falere of a District Court order Des dism(ssihg a Cuil cosa Leve on of se partres i3 an .( litigent of the tine of the receist inecrcerafed fo e of suct sive rotice of the exystence ordr to of 2i7her FRAP. Rde 4O) or 28 45.C.2107(c),10nsht urlotpn of the Due frcesr clase of the 2 Ferteerst Anerdrat fo the us constitdio? 2{B3 I 4A (( 75 t/ is seck a UNloton yes Scfficrent to Petitrone Hill the relset 22~√ of over ferming (art of Rppeds order of TLe 2019-28 Pictrs Crt's rder of 2ol8-MAt-oz?

Whether the dismissal of a civil case by a district court for lack of jurisdiction over an incarcerated petitioner violates the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment