Can a federal court's judge just make-up his own rules that implementation of violate civil, constitutional and all legal rights and privileges protected by the laws of the United States, without incurring liability to the one's he inj ured so corruptly?

Will you people back-up your ruling in Oct. 21, 1991 Mireles v Waxo 502us9 112Sct286 116led2d9, where you defined the conditions under which a judge can be sued for civil damages for his non-judicial acts as without any jurisdiction to actjudicially or after a judge you people protect, from liability to the . one's he hurt illegally?

Where in the Constitution is the provision that denies application of the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection clause and the Civil Rights Act of 1856, 42usc1931; clause "to sue, be parties, give evidence" as it applies to every person depri ved by any person of any right or privilege secured by the Constitution or lavs of. the United States as this clause includes the deprivers, the judges you-all inL protect as it applies against you also?

Will the SCxTus uphold your own opinion in March 7, 1859 Ableman v Booth 21How 506 16Led169; March 22, 1922 Ponzi v Fessenden 258uS254,261 42Sct309 66Led507, 611, "the court that first axquires jurisdiction holds it to the exclusion of all others, until it has exhausted it's authority over the possession of the person or property; or untiliit's judgment is satisfied?'

Can a federal judge, at will, amend terms of a civil suit from 42usc1985 via 28USC1343, to a 42USc1983 suit in order to claim the ability to dismiss it after I questioned his integrity and honesty in writing per my right?

Can a federal court's judge make up his own rules that violate civil, constitutional and legal rights and privileges protected by the laws of the United States, without incurring liability to the ones he injured so corruptly?