No. 19-5505
Jose Hernandez-Carbajal v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel evidentiary-hearing ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel notice-of-appeal plea-agreement plea-bargaining sentencing sentencing-error sentencing-guidelines sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Whether Petitioner's Sixth Amendment Rights to the Effective Assistance of Counsel Was Violated in the Follow?
a) When Counsel Failed to file a Notice of Appeal.
b) Failing to Object the PSR under 2L1.2(b)(1).
c) Misadvising Petitioner that if he Plea Guilty at arraignment, he would receive the benefit of the "Fast Track program."
d) Failing to Challenge Petitioner's Sentence based on the unwarranted
II. Whether the District Court Failed to Grant The Petitioner An Evidentiary Hearing For The Development of Revelant Facts Relating To Petitioner's Sixth Amendment Of Law Violation Claims?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Petitioner's Sixth Amendment Rights to the Effective Assistance of Counsel Was Violated
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-06-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 9, 2019)
Attorneys
Jose Hernandez-Carbajal
Jose Hernandez-Carbajal — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent