No. 19-5500

Michael Woolls v. Virginia

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-08-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights code-of-law disability-rights due-process equal-protection mental-capacity mental-retardation political-concerns standard-of-review standing
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)

My question in the forma of my documents, is am I entitled by law of confusing of high standard issue of Law of the Court 's as A disabled person of that of mental retardation as my understanding of the froma as followed, is there political concerns in this matter on behalf of my mental retardation and if so can code of law of change be in the Appendix Booklet 2019 for those who are incapable of understanding it fully.

And by due process of law obtained by lawship as stated for the right to an attorney in criminal proceedings is enshrined within the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution . However, not until the 1963 Supreme Court case of Gideon v. Wainwriaht was it established that criminal defendants who are unable to afford a lawyer have a right to free legal representation and there should it not be for A Plaintive who does not understand their rights at full to that of Law Litigations issue of the right of law and is not in A criminal matter be given the same rights as due.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Am I entitled by law to a higher standard of review as a disabled person with mental retardation?

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-15
Waiver of right of respondent Virginia to respond filed.
2019-07-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 6, 2019)

Attorneys

Michael Woolls
Michael Woolls — Petitioner
Virginia
Toby Jay HeytensOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent